<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Enigmatic Thought &#187; Catalyst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/tag/catalyst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com</link>
	<description>import com.enigmaticThought.blog;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flex OIM review</title>
		<link>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlexSDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gumbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enigmaticthought.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the Flex 4, aka Gumbo, Open Iteration Meeting (recording here) dealt primarily with the work Adobe plans to do to bring parity (or near parity) between new Flex 4 components and the old Flex 3 components and the transition from Flex 3 to Flex 4. Just to review, the new component and skinning architecture has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the <a href="http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/gumbo/">Flex 4, aka Gumbo, </a> Open Iteration Meeting (<a href="http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p51717913/">recording here</a>) dealt primarily with the work Adobe plans to do to bring parity (or near parity) between new Flex 4 components and the old Flex 3 components and the transition from Flex 3 to Flex 4.</p>
<p>Just to review, the new component and skinning architecture has been dubbed Spark. Halo, now referred to as MX, is the current Flex architecture and will eventually fade into the sunset (or Flex 5).  That doesn&#8217;t mean Halo will go away, just that the goal is to transition new users and applications to Spark.  They also emphasized that with Flex 4, you may not be able to create a pure Spark application due to lack of Spark components.  With Flex 5 being the targeted release for the ability to replace all the MX system with the Spark components.  Thus Flex 4 will be a boundary release, allowing a user to mix in Spark components alongside the existing MX components.</p>
<p>The primary driver of Spark will be Flash Builder 4 &#038; Catalyst.  In the meeting we were told that Flash Builder 4 will offer a new choice when creating a Flex project.  Whether to use Spark/Halo or Just Halo.  This will alter the auto-complete and code hinting suggestions.  The user can still use one or both, but this will allow Adobe to shape the experience toward Spark.  Thus allowing a more natural feeling transition without an forced choice that will lock a user down.  Catalyst will require Spark for the output it creates.</p>
<p>There will also be a separation of the theme and the components themselves.  There will be both Spark and MX components, and they will be named separately from the TBD (&#8220;Spark&#8221;) theme and the Halo theme.  So the look &#038; feel will be separated from the functionality.  No name exists for the &#8220;Spark&#8221; theme, but after the suggestion of &#8220;Fire&#8221; or &#8220;Smoke&#8221; by <a href="http://blog.simb.net/">Simeon Bateman</a>, <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/mchotin/">Matt Chotin</a> replies &#8220;but we were thinking along those lines <img src='http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>Along with this news, the presentation went through a good bit of Spark components.  Adobe is working on better Spark/MX container compatibility.  That may mean adjusting some MX components as well to unify them using Interfaces rather than hard classes.  Each Spark component had a nice &#8220;what we&#8217;re fixing&#8221; list as well.  The end goal is not to clone a MX component&#8217;s functionality but to work out the most features while keeping things simple.  One example was that instead of having border styles of many components, a border container was created that would allow a border to be created around a single or many components.  </p>
<p>Currently Flex 4 is targeted Early 2010 with a Late 2009 second beta.</p>
<p>Other handy links:<br />
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/flex3and4_differences.html">Differences between Flex 3 and Flex 4</a><br />
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/flex4sdk_whatsnew.html">What&#8217;s new in Flex 4 beta</a><br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts (generated):</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting/' title='Flex Open Iteration Meeting'>Flex Open Iteration Meeting</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/07/flash-builder-4-delay-doesnt-impact-catalyst/' title='Flash Builder 4 delay doesn&#8217;t impact Catalyst'>Flash Builder 4 delay doesn&#8217;t impact Catalyst</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/11/scientific-notation-patch-accepted/' title='Scientific Notation Patch Accepted'>Scientific Notation Patch Accepted</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/09/flash-builders-new-menu/' title='Altering Flash Builder&#8217;s new menu'>Altering Flash Builder&#8217;s new menu</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/how-to-flex-the-twitter-api/' title='How to Flex the Twitter API'>How to Flex the Twitter API</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Builder 4 delay doesn&#8217;t impact Catalyst</title>
		<link>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/07/flash-builder-4-delay-doesnt-impact-catalyst/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/07/flash-builder-4-delay-doesnt-impact-catalyst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlexSDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enigmaticthought.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the news that the Flex 4 beta is going to have a sequal which will delay Flex 4 &#038; Flash Builder 4 until 2010 you may wonder about Catalyst. Since the fancy demo at 360, I&#8217;m looking forward to playing with it. Especially since Matt Chotin promised the code it produced would actually be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the news that <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/flex/archives/2009/07/flex_4_beta_update_1.html">the Flex 4 beta is going to have a sequal</a> which will delay Flex 4 &#038; Flash Builder 4 until 2010 you may wonder about <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashcatalyst/">Catalyst</a>.  Since the fancy demo at 360, I&#8217;m looking forward to playing with it.  Especially since Matt Chotin promised the code it produced would actually be usable.  Well, <a href="http://blog.simb.net/">Simon Bateman</a> mentioned both Flex &#038; Catalyst via <a href="http://twitter.com/simBateman/status/2749526844">Twitter</a> whether the change would impact Catalyst, and Chotin replied <a href="http://twitter.com/mchotin/status/2751220674">Just to clarify, this date change doesn&#8217;t affect Catalyst</a>.  I assume that means Catalyst wasn&#8217;t going to show up until next year anyway since it&#8217;s &#8220;Based on the open source Flex 4 Framework&#8221;.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts (generated):</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting-2/' title='Flex OIM review'>Flex OIM review</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/07/bug-hunting-fx-1/' title='Bug hunting in the Flex SDK (part 1)'>Bug hunting in the Flex SDK (part 1)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/05/bug-quash/' title='Bug Quash'>Bug Quash</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/11/scientific-notation-patch-accepted/' title='Scientific Notation Patch Accepted'>Scientific Notation Patch Accepted</a></li>
<li><a href='http://enigmaticthought.com/2009/08/flex-open-iteration-meeting/' title='Flex Open Iteration Meeting'>Flex Open Iteration Meeting</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.enigmaticthought.com/2009/07/flash-builder-4-delay-doesnt-impact-catalyst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
